Digital Forensic Case Studies
Explore real-world applications of our forensic methodologies. These anonymised case studies highlight how we uncover, preserve, and present digital evidence in complex legal and corporate matters.
15+
Years Experience
500+
Cases Examined
6
Specialist Services
CCTV Footage
Disputed Timing & Identification in Alleged Assault
Issue
Prosecution relied on exported CCTV footage to place the accused at the scene at a specific time. The defence disputed the timestamp accuracy and the identification due to poor lighting.
Issue
Prosecution relied on exported CCTV footage to place the accused at the scene at a specific time. The defence disputed the timestamp accuracy and the identification due to poor lighting.
Our expert report demonstrated a 14-minute discrepancy in the CCTV timestamp, proving the accused could not have been present at the time of the offense. The prosecution subsequently withdrew the charges.
Mobile Phone & Cloud
Intellectual Property Theft by Departing Executive
Issue
A senior executive abruptly resigned to join a competitor. The company suspected confidential client lists and proprietary schematics were taken, but initial internal IT checks showed no mass USB transfers.
Issue
Forensic acquisition of the executive’s company-issued iPhone and laptop. Analysis focused on cloud-synchronised data, deleted application artifacts, and browser cache analysis which revealed unauthorised access to a personal cloud storage account.
Recovered deleted SQLite databases proving the executive uploaded 4GB of sensitive data to a personal Dropbox via the mobile app minutes before returning the device. The evidence facilitated an immediate injunction.
CCTV Footage
Disputed Timing & Identification in Alleged Assault
Issue
Prosecution relied on exported CCTV footage to place the accused at the scene at a specific time. The defence disputed the timestamp accuracy and the identification due to poor lighting.
Issue
Prosecution relied on exported CCTV footage to place the accused at the scene at a specific time. The defence disputed the timestamp accuracy and the identification due to poor lighting.
Our expert report demonstrated a 14-minute discrepancy in the CCTV timestamp, proving the accused could not have been present at the time of the offense. The prosecution subsequently withdrew the charges.
CCTV Footage
Disputed Timing & Identification in Alleged Assault
Issue
Prosecution relied on exported CCTV footage to place the accused at the scene at a specific time. The defence disputed the timestamp accuracy and the identification due to poor lighting.
Issue
Prosecution relied on exported CCTV footage to place the accused at the scene at a specific time. The defence disputed the timestamp accuracy and the identification due to poor lighting.
Our expert report demonstrated a 14-minute discrepancy in the CCTV timestamp, proving the accused could not have been present at the time of the offense. The prosecution subsequently withdrew the charges.